Which is the greater risk: climate change, or terrorists coming over our southern border?

It would be fascinating to hear a discussion between Jordan Peterson, Jonathan Haidt and Steven Pinker on what psychological traits tend to push someone towards one or the other answer.

For example, it’s fairly predictable that liberals will tend to say climate change is the bigger threat, while conservatives will tend to say it’s terrorists. But why? What cocktail of openness, suspicion, disgust, respect for tradition, etc., makes that happen?

Sure, sure. I know all of you believe your position is based on facts and logic, not all that psychobabble.