{"id":2212,"date":"2022-01-28T20:44:36","date_gmt":"2022-01-28T20:44:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/?p=2212"},"modified":"2022-01-28T20:53:17","modified_gmt":"2022-01-28T20:53:17","slug":"picking-a-scotus-justice-based-on-race-and-sex","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/2022\/01\/28\/picking-a-scotus-justice-based-on-race-and-sex\/","title":{"rendered":"Picking a SCOTUS justice based on race and sex"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Now that Justice Breyer has announced his intention to retire, we&#8217;re going to have to live through another SCOTUS circus. Democrats and Republicans will both say things we all know aren&#8217;t true &#8212; and they know aren&#8217;t true &#8212; contradicting things they said just a short time ago. <\/p>\n<p>Biden has promised to nominate a black woman. That doesn&#8217;t seem to have gone well with his VP pick, but &#8230; whatever. <\/p>\n<p>Tulsi Gabbard had this to say about it. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Biden\u2019s mistake: He should not be choosing a Supreme Court justice based on the color of their skin or sex, but rather on their qualifications &#038; commitment to uphold our Constitution &#038; the freedoms guaranteed to all Americans in that document which is the foundation of our nation<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I think Biden is at least five years past his sell-by date, but I do want to try (however half-heartedly) to look at this from his point of view. What is the point of prejudging the candidates and choosing to have a black woman on the Supreme Court? <\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s set aside the obvious answer &#8212; that he was appealing to his base &#8212; and examine this. Why is the race and sex of a SCOTUS justice important? <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s based on the assumption that a woman will view issues differently than a man, and a black person will view issues differently than a non-black person. Statistically speaking, that might be true. For example, I&#8217;ve been reliably informed that women are one standard deviation more likely to be interested in other people than men, and one standard deviation less likely to be interested in things \/ gadgets than men. <\/p>\n<p>But isn&#8217;t judging an individual by an alleged group characteristic <i>exactly what we don&#8217;t want to do<\/i>? Isn&#8217;t Biden&#8217;s declaration, in fact, the very definition of racism and sexism? <\/p>\n<p>Are all women the same? Are all black people the same? <\/p>\n<p>Would Candace Owens judge a case the same way as Whoopi Goldberg? <\/p>\n<p>Obviously not. In fact, that&#8217;s so obvious it&#8217;s hard to imagine a person with two brain cells believing that race or sex <i>determine<\/i> a person&#8217;s political or judicial philosophy. As little as I think of Joe Biden, I do believe he has two brain cells. So what the heck is going on? <\/p>\n<p>Okay, yes, it&#8217;s a crass political overture to interest groups. I get that. But there are some people who think this is a good thing. <i>What are they thinking?<\/i> <\/p>\n<p>They clearly know there are conservative black women in the world, so they can&#8217;t be so stupid as to believe that a black woman will necessarily vote a certain way. Again, think of Candace Owens. I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;s not on Biden&#8217;s list. <\/p>\n<p>What they really mean is &#8220;a liberal judge with decent qualifications who is also a black woman.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>But why? Why not an Asian? Why not a Native American? Why not somebody in a wheel chair? There are any number of demographic groups that have not been proportionately represented on the Supreme Court. <\/p>\n<p>Why prejudge the issue this way? It makes no sense at all. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Now that Justice Breyer has announced his intention to retire, we&#8217;re going to have to live through another SCOTUS circus. Democrats and Republicans will both say things we all know aren&#8217;t true &#8212; and they know aren&#8217;t true &#8212; contradicting things they said just a short time ago. Biden has promised to nominate a black &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/2022\/01\/28\/picking-a-scotus-justice-based-on-race-and-sex\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Picking a SCOTUS justice based on race and sex&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2212"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2212\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2217,"href":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2212\/revisions\/2217"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crowhill.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}