Administrative agencies are a good idea, until they go too far

SCOTUS was right to smack down the EPA in WV v EPA, as P&C detail in this episode.

The world is simply too complicated for the morons in Congress to legislate all the details. They have to set policy goals, and allow people — (1) with brains, and (2) who aren’t distracted by committee arguments over whether a man can get pregnant — to work out the finer points.

That’s all well and good.

But when administrative agencies try to set national policy, they’ve gone too far.

That’s precisely what the EPA did with their Clean Power Plan, and SCOTUS was right to tell them to soak their heads.

What is the biggest “existential” threat we face?

I’m getting sick of the word “existential” because of the way the left reflexively uses it with climate change, but it seems like the most apt word for my question here.

A friend just posted something on LinkedIn about how quantum computing might save us by figuring out how to address climate change. I replied, “Have you read Dune?”

Dune is set long after humanity has won a battle against the thinking machines. After the Butlerian jihad they instituted various conventions to prevent anyone from building a thinking machine. (Basically the rest of the universe would come down on you with atomics and wipe you out.)

Threat #1 — machines taking over.

We’ve all just lived through Covid, which — while mild by historic standards — illustrates that we are not immune to pandemics. Something natural or man-made might be lurking out there, and we are woefully unprepared.

Threat #2 — pathogens.

Iran is probably going to get a nuke. (Thanks, Obama.) Several other not-entirely-stable countries have them. China and Russia already have them. The threat of nuclear war is still very serious, although we seem to have forgotten it after the fall of the Soviet Union.

Threat #3 — nuclear war.

Elon Musk is one of the only people I know who’s talking about population collapse as a potential problem. Birth rates and sperm counts are falling, and weird stuff seems to be happening.

This seems like a serious, but mostly survivable problem.

Thread #4 — population collapse.

I list this one for completeness, but I don’t worry about it.

Threat #5 — alien invasion.

Climate change is a real threat, but I don’t think it’s even close to #s 1-4. We can deal with rising seas, bad weather and such. If we’re hit with any of these, I hope it’s climate change.

Threat #6 — climate change.

What have I missed? And which one do you think is the biggest threat?

The “make it stop” interpretation of the 2020 election

Today I read somewhere that people were motivated to vote for Biden in the hopes of “making it stop.” That got me wondering — what were they trying to stop? The first thought is that they wanted to stop Trump (mean tweets and all that), but they might also have been trying to stop the left’s ongoing tantrum about him.

E.g., “Look, I don’t care all that much, just please stop all the drama!!” It’s like the mother in the grocery store who gives in to the wailing brat who wants a cookie. “Okay, fine, here’s a cookie. Will you please shut up!?”

A repeat Biden v. Trump election in 2024 would be a national nightmare, and a disaster for the country and the world. But I’m hoping for something better. Half of G.O.P. Voters Ready to Leave Trump Behind, Poll Finds. And it’s becoming obvious that the left is abandoning Biden. That trend will only accelerate as the media stops covering for that moron.

At this point, I’m hoping for DeSantis on the Republican side. I have no idea who to hope for on the Democrat side. It would be wonderful if it was Tulsi Gabbard, but that’s not going to happen.

The lovely thing about a DeSantis v Gabbard contest is that while I would have a preference, I’d be fine with either choice. I’ve never felt that way about any election in my lifetime.