Author: Crowhill Report

I strongly suspect both he and his father are corrupt and guilty of very serious crimes, but I do have some sympathy for Hunter’s claim that people didn’t have a right to snoop around on his laptop.

If you take your suit to the dry cleaner and forget about it, after some length of time the dry cleaner owns the suit and can sell it or throw it away or whatever they want. Something similar seems to apply at laptop repair shops. If you leave it there long enough, the shop owns it.

It’s not clear to me that means they can snoop around on it.

Common decency should prevent a person from snooping around on someone else’s laptop, but it should go further than that. There should probably be legal protections for your data. If I find somebody’s phone, I’d be a creep if I took their photos and posted them on the internet, but it should also be illegal.

In a conversation this evening, a woman explained how her daughter is heterosexual, but “identifies” as bisexual because she wants to feel open to people in various scenarios.

That’s (1) completely foreign to my brain, and (2) an interesting factor to keep in mind when people talk about statistics.

From time to time (not as often recently, I think) I’ve seen calls to “bring your authentic self” to work, social media, etc. The idea is that we, the loving community, want to know all your cute and quirky little habits. We want to see the whole person.

We don’t only want to know that you’re an expert on differential equations. We want to know that you play bluegrass mandolin, that you love soccer, and that you’re a fan of Martin Scorsese films.

This is a lie.

What they really want is to ensure that all your “cute and quirky little habits” line up with the approved standards.

You can be a genius at differential equations, but if you listen to the wrong podcasts, you’re canceled.

“Bring your authentic self” is tyranny.

There’s a lot of chatter about all the jobs that will be lost due to artificial intelligence. It’s a pretty serious matter, and it’s upon us.

ChatGPT will — at a minimum — revolutionize search, and will most likely replace at least half the staff of most content companies. E.g., a newsroom with 20 reporters will be able to get along with 10 reporters who use ChatGPT. And probably fewer.

There will be similar changes in other areas, such as HR, legal services, or anything that requires the evaluation or creation of text. Programming will be hit hard as well. (Yes, ChatGPT can write programs.)

Services like Midjourney (which created the image on this page) will reduce the need for graphic designers. Who needs to hire an artist when AI can create an image in about 5 seconds?

For the short term, people won’t lose their jobs to AI, they’ll lose their jobs to people who are using AI.

My career has been in publishing, and I was hoping to ride that out before Skynet takes over, but now I’m wondering what publishing will be like two or three years from now. I’m very optimistic about what will be created over the next few years, but I’m not optimistic about the job prospects.

So I’m thinking about other lines of work. I have a new beverage idea that I’m experimenting with. I figure people will still (or maybe especially) need an adult beverage when they’ve become redundant.

Now we’re giving them tanks? This is a dangerous escalation. What’s going to happen when a Russian missile kills some of the U.S. advisers and trainers we’re sending along with those tanks?

Don’t forget that Hunter worked for a Ukrainian company called Burisma, and there are reasonable allegations that some of Hunter’s absurd salary was going to Joe.

Or is it just a coincidence that Hunter got a sweet job in Ukraine with Joe’s influence, and now we’re sending billions to Ukraine?

Is Zelenskyy threatening to reveal some juicy details if Joe doesn’t give him tanks?