Author: Crowhill Report

You’ve probably heard that some tech thought leaders are calling for a 6-month pause in AI development so we can put some parameters around this developing industry. Morning Wire had an interesting show on the subject.

Several analogies come to mind. The Sorcerer’s Apprentice. The genie in the bottle. The Butlerian Jihad in Dune. The Star Trek episode “What are Little Girls Made Of?” Terminator.

In short, this is a classic, oft-repeated fear: that we will create something we can’t control, which will then control (or destroy) us.

Remember Isaac Asimov and his rules of robotics, which, BTW, never quite worked — indicating that we probably won’t come up with the right set of rules.

But humanity is plowing forward without any rules at all, which is almost certainly a mistake.

Here are some questions.

• Will companies observe the pause, even if we have one?
• Who should create the rules?
• Who should enforce the rules?
• Should we impose rules on U.S. companies while rogue nations proceed with no limits?

In Dune, the horror of enslavement to computers led all of humanity to agree to absolute war against anyone who created a thinking machine. We’re not just talking about the death penalty. They would nuke your planet if you violated the terms of the jihad.

Is the threat that serious?

My concern is that we’re ruled by morons who are more concerned about trivial things that play well in the press than in any sort of long-term planning. How can we expect such a broken political system to yield any reliable results? It’s as if the Hun is invading, and all our generals are worried about what color to make the uniform pants.

Imagine a huge, white wedding tent on the edge of the Chesapeake Bay, between the docks and the jetty. The tent has seen a few years, and it’s fraying a bit around the edges. Some of the seams don’t close properly. It’s not tied down the way it should be. It doesn’t look like it would pass a safety inspection.

The frame of the tent is made of metal beams. Electrical wires run along these beams to power chandeliers and electric heaters. The junction box outside the tent is exposed to the elements.

It starts to rain. The carpet along the edge of the inside area is getting soaked in several locations. Could an electrical current travel from that junction box through the wet carpet?

The rain finally stops, and volunteers move tables so resort workers can bring in industrial vacuum cleaners to slurp up the water.

The afternoon turns bright and sunny, and things start to dry out a bit. There’s some hope we’re past the worst, and ready for a lovely evening.

150 dancers are dressed in their 1920s costumes, ready to have a fun evening of dinner, drinks, and lots of dancing.

Then the storm rolls in. High winds. Black clouds. Lightning. Whitecaps gleam on the dark grey water and sea mist blows across the docks. The ducks are hiding their heads under their wings.

Thor is angry.

The flaps of the tent crack in the howling wind. The doors crash open and closed. The chandeliers sway. The guests are casting wary eyes at the heavy electric heaters, dangling from the roof on thin chains. And everyone is wondering what happens if lightning hits one of the metal braces that hold the tent together.

A friend asks, “Do you feel like we’re on the Titanic?”

“We’re certainly dressed for it,” I said.

It was a memorable night, to be sure. The organizers ended things early, and some of us retreated to the small dance floor in the restaurant. No one was hurt, and we’ll be talking about this “meet me at the beach” for years to come.

Ben Shapiro had a good podcast yesterday on the origins of the epidemic of depression the country is going through. It’s episode 1699.

He doesn’t believe the solution is political. It’s social and cultural. It’s a combination of a loss of meaning, a lack of connectedness with other real people, and connection with fellow complainers online.

He also spoke about the computer revolution as the third major change in human history. (The first being agriculture, the second being industry.)

It’s worth your time.

A lot of people think that would be a good use of time travel. If you could kill Hitler before he came to power, you could (they say) stop WWII, the Holocaust, etc.

I’m not so convinced. I’m afraid that if someone went back and killed Hitler, somebody more competent would have taken his place, and he would have taken the world down a similar path — but the Nazis would have won.

I want somebody to go back in time and find the person who turned the wedding toast into a speech, and convince him out of it. Or maybe just tie him up for a few hours to prevent it from happening.

When I was a kid, I asked for a cast of a Neanderthal skull for my birthday. And I got it. My parents encouraged intellectual pursuits.

You might guess that I’ve always been interested in primitive man, and so does Google, because I get a lot of stories about it in my newsfeed.

When I see these articles, I often imagine how other people would react to them. E.g., my fundamentalist friends, my overly “scientific” friends, etc.

Leaving aside the 6-day creationist POV, I chiefly imagine these three views of early man.

1. They knew things that we’ve forgotten.

They understood ancient mysteries and were closer to nature. They didn’t need medicines and therapy. If only we could talk to a Druid, or to someone from Atlantis, we’d be so much better off.

2. They were little more than talking apes.

Who cares what they thought? They didn’t know the most basic realities of their surroundings. They were superstitious and ignorant, and while they may have known some crafts that we’ve forgotten, they really couldn’t teach us much.

3. They “knew” things that we’ve suppressed.

Our overly scientific, rationalist approach to the world has caused us to ignore and suppress things that ancient man accepted, even though he might not have understood exactly why. As a consequence, we’ve lost some of what it means to be human.

I tend to prefer views 2 and 3. Our ancestors were certainly ignorant and superstitious, but because they didn’t experience the distortion of post-Enlightenment epistemological worries, their cultures and beliefs can give us insights into human psychology.

Having said that, it still might be fun to talk to a Druid. Especially Merlin.