It was more civil, but less interesting.
Why does the moderator get to set the agenda and ask the questions? Why not let the candidates ask each other what they want to talk about?
2 thoughts on “The VP debate”
Comments are closed.
A public record of some of my thoughts. Feel free to comment, but don't expect me to respond.
It was more civil, but less interesting.
Why does the moderator get to set the agenda and ask the questions? Why not let the candidates ask each other what they want to talk about?
Comments are closed.
Pretty boring. But that’s not a bad thing. Let’s get back to boring!
This was an interesting attempt at a non-partisan pundit review of the VP debate, focusing on the candidates’ performance, policy issues and efficacy of debates. Overall, they seemed to conclude the debate was indeed more civil but not impactful to the race nor informative to voters.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/videos/the-vice-presidential-debate-was-civil-but-did-it-shake-up-the-race/