I thought escalating U.S. involvement in Ukraine was sufficient grounds to worry about WW3, but with the Israel-Hamas war, I think it’s looking worse. And the fact that we have a babbling, tottering, weak fool in the White House makes me even more concerned. I would pray for his quick removal except that it would put Harris in charge. She would cackle and talk to us like a simpering 2nd grade teacher while the world burned.
Since there’s no Speaker of the House, I think that means Sen. Patty Murray is next in line — if both Joe and Kamala were to leave office. I know nothing about her, but I suspect she can’t be worse than either of those two.
But I’m starting to wonder what kind of a war WW3 will be. The U.S. has the greatest military on the planet, which means that people who want to do us harm are likely to find other ways of fighting — like Hamas does against Israel.
That bumbling traitor in the White House has allowed millions of unvetted people to swarm our country. There’s no reason to doubt that a significant minority of them are foreign agents of one sort or another. If open hostilities break out, I suspect we’ll be seeing things like attacks on key infrastructure and terror attacks against the population.
Given what we’ve seen in Europe, I wonder how many college-educated morons would support them.
It’s obvious Hamas has tried to helter skelter and bootstrap it’s way in to at least a regional war. Their attack was meant to provoke exactly what Israel is doing now with the hope that the other Arab countries will join in. Russia has strong ties to Iran and Syria, so you have to wonder what happens if either of those two countries join in and the US retaliates against them… What happens if the retaliation strikes against Russian troops/advisors stationed in Syria or Iran?
After Oct 7, I’m like… ok, only Arabs we should let in are Christians fleeing Islamic rule. I say that not because of Hamas itself, but the reactions of so many over Europe and USA in response to the Hamas attack…the glee in their eyes.
Back in the old days (I’m told), immigration policies were built based on who would most effectively assimilate into our culture. We preferred Europeans because they were the most like us.
These days we seem to have the opposite approach. America — as Obama lectured us — needs to be “fundamentally transformed.” The goal of immigration now is not “come assimilate into our great culture,” but “come make us different, because we’re so horrible.”
It should be obvious that Arab Christians would assimilate better than Arab Muslims. Which probably means that we promote Muslim immigration more.
Why did America let in so many Catholics and Jews who were for the most part deeply despised by Protestant America? And yet, I think that something good came out of the mix, including the intellectual atheism that was so prevalent among the Jews. Of course a lot of tension and even violence also came about, as is to be expected from a country of immigrants. That is simply what America is, not a country of “blood and soil.”