Now we’re giving them tanks? This is a dangerous escalation. What’s going to happen when a Russian missile kills some of the U.S. advisers and trainers we’re sending along with those tanks?
Don’t forget that Hunter worked for a Ukrainian company called Burisma, and there are reasonable allegations that some of Hunter’s absurd salary was going to Joe.
Or is it just a coincidence that Hunter got a sweet job in Ukraine with Joe’s influence, and now we’re sending billions to Ukraine?
Is Zelenskyy threatening to reveal some juicy details if Joe doesn’t give him tanks?
I don’t understand the “dangerous escalation” thing here. We send small numbers of support troops into war zones all the time, and it is never in those situations considered an act of war on the US if soldiers we sent into a war zone on foreign soil get killed. Never has been, no reason to think it ever will be.
Maybe Biden just doesn’t think Russia should be allowed to roll over northeastern Europe and commit war crimes at will. You know I’m no Biden fan but even a stopped clock is right twice a day and he’s got at least one more thing to be right about before he hits that number.
It’s an escalation because we’re sending in more advanced weaponry and advisors.
Didn’t we start in Vietnam with advisors?
Escalation, yes. Don’t see it as particularly dangerous.
QUOTE: Is Zelenskyy threatening to reveal some juicy details if Joe doesn’t give him tanks?
Is there any evidence that would confirm or lend credence to such a suspicion? If there was something to reveal, it would seem Zelensky would have “spilled the beans” when Trump “asked” that he “look into” Joe Biden and Hunter Biden back in 2019 (while he was withholding Ukrainian military aid). A revelation of that nature may have even caused Biden to lose the 2020 election. Yet, there was nothing revealed from that Trump’s “request” nor Giuliani’s “investigation” on the matter.