Pigweed and Crowhill drink and review two variations of Pigweed’s Cheeky Monkey, an English IPA, then discuss belief in God.
Unbelievers usually think believers are stupid, while believers usually think unbelievers are misinformed or badly motivated. People need to get over that kind of thinking.
After a quick review of the ontological argument, Crowhill gives his opinion on the meaning of faith and how it relates to belief in God, and arguments for or against belief in God.
In general, arguments on either side are crap. E.g., what do we know about “being”? And how can an argument lead a person to the kind of certainty that faith requires?
The boys go through some big picture perspectives on why to believe or not believe, then give their own perspectives and advice.
I think that the trick is that you are speaking of evidence where you should be using such terms as “alleged evidence” and “putative evidence.” The religious person accordingly claims to have evidence for her belief, but so what? If you simply say that she has evidence the discussion is biased in her favor.